Search
×
E-mail

Purification Guide: Chromatography Resin Selection

Table of Content [Hide]


    For researchers, protein purification is a key step in studying the structure and function of proteins. Although there is no need to pursue high industrial-grade yield, the requirements for purity are extremely strict--structural research often requires ≥ 95%, and enzyme activity experiments must be at least ≥ 90%. Therefore, the first goal of purification is to be "pure enough", and on this basis, both yield and cost are taken into account.


    The resolution, selectivity, and binding capacity of different resins determine the separation effect and also affect the success of your experiment. Affinity, ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction, multimodal, reversed-phase, gel filtration and other chromatography each has its own advantages and corresponds to different purification stages. The following table will help you quickly compare and find the most suitable match.


    table-1-characteristics-of-different-chromatography-resins-and-their-application-in-the-purification-stage.jpg

    Table 1: Characteristics of different chromatography resins and their application in the purification stage


    Among them, affinity chromatography has the best selectivity based on its ability to specifically bind to the target protein, but not to other impurity proteins. However, affinity chromatography is not optional for all protein purification, and it is not possible to produce an affinity chromatography resin for each target protein. There are many mature affinity chromatography resins for widely used protein purification tags, such as His, Fc, GST tags, etc. Affinity chromatography is the best choice for protein purification in scientific research field. For some proteins which have low expression level and are difficult to purify, more than one purification tag can be added during expression, and two-step affinity chromatography can be used.


    When using affinity chromatography, it is necessary to understand the principle of affinity. According to the factors that may affect the purification effect, the sample adjustment, buffer selection, chromatography steps and other aspects of the chromatography process can be optimized. As a common example, the His-tagged protein helps us better understand how affinity chromatography works in practice.


    The imidazole group on the side chain of histidine (His) can form coordination bonds with various metal ions (such as Ni2 +, Co2 +, Cu2 +, Zn2 +, etc.) and selectively bind. Among them, Ni2 + is the preferred metal ion for purifying His tag protein, and it is also the most widely used metal ion. At present, tetravalent chelated NTA affinity chromatography resins and pentavalent chelated TED are widely used. Among them, the Ni ions chelated in TED form are extremely stable, can tolerate reducing agents and chelating agents such as EDTA, and are suitable for mammalian cell expression supernatants, direct loading and purification and renaturation solution loading with reducing agent. When selecting other metal ions for purification, IMAC resin can be selected to chelate the metal ions by itself and then purify them.


    Product

    Chelation Method

    Principle

    Advantages

    Ni Chromstar® FF

    NTA

    Tetravalent chelation

    Large particle size, low back pressure, widely used

    Ni Chromstar® HR

    NTA

    Tetravalent chelation

    Small particle size, high binding capacity, widely used

    IMAC Chromstar® FF

    NTA

    Tetravalent chelation

    Can bind metal ions by itself

    Ni Chromstar® Excel

    TED

    Pentavalent chelation

    Can tolerate reducing agents, chelating agents and low-concentration alkali

    Table 2: Introduction to the characteristics of resins in different chelated forms of BioLink


    When using Ni affinity, pay attention to: metal ions are positively charged. In order to avoid non-specific binding, a certain concentration of NaCl should be added to the buffer; At the same time, low concentration imidazole can be added to inhibit non-specific adsorption dominated by non-His tag. After the sample is loaded and combined, an appropriate concentration of imidazole should also be selected as Wash to remove the impurity protein with weak non-specific binding and increase the concentration of the target protein in the eluate.


    Case 1: Purification of Recombinant Collagen

    Sample: Recombinant Collagen

    Column: Ni Chromstar® Excel (0.77 * 10 cm, column volume (CV) = 4.7 ml)

    Buffer A:  20 mM PB + 0.15 M NaCl (pH 7.5)

    Buffer B: 20 mM PB + 0.15 M NaCl (pH 7.5) + 0.5 M Imidazole (pH 7.5)

    Step

    Mobile Phase

    Column Volume (CV)

    Linear Flow Rate
    (cm/h)

    Volume Flow Rate
    (ml/min)

    Equilibration

    Buffer A

    10

    127.5

    1

    Loading

    Sample

    20

    127.5

    1

    Post-equilibration

    Buffer A

    5

    127.5

    1

    Washing

    90% Buffer A+10% Buffer B

    5

    127.5

    1

    Elution

    Buffer B

    5

    127.5

    1

    Table 3: Detailed steps of recombinant collagen purification


    figures-1-ni-resin-chromatogram-and-gel-diagram.jpg


    figures-2-ni-resin-chromatogram-and-gel-diagram.jpg

    Figures 1 and 2: Ni resin chromatogram and gel diagram


    Common Problems

    Possible Causes

    Solutions

    Protein does not bind to the column

    • His tag is lost

    • The sample or binding buffer is incorrect

    • The histidine tag is not fully exposed

    √ Increase the number of His tags if necessary (usually 6–10)
    √ Check the pH and the composition of the sample and binding buffer
    √ Purify under denaturing conditions (using 8M urea, 6M guanidine hydrochloride, 1% SDS) and add 1–2mM DTT

    Protein binds to the column but cannot be eluted

    • Elution conditions are too mild

    • The protein has other non-specific adsorption with the column

    • The protein has precipitated on the column

    √ Use increasing imidazole concentration gradient elution or lower pH to find the optimal elution conditions
    √ Add non-ionic detergent to the elution buffer (e.g., 2% Triton X-100) or increase the concentration of NaCl
    √ Reduce the sample loading amount and incubation time, use detergent (1%–2% Triton X-100) or change the concentration of NaCl, etc.

    Too many impurity bands

    • The affinity of impurity proteins for the nickel column is too strong

    • Impurity proteins bind to the target protein

    √ Increase the initial imidazole concentration for the binding of impurity proteins to the nickel column.
    √ It can be eliminated by adding detergent (1%–2% Triton X-100) before sonication.

    Table 4: Common problems in protein purification


    If purity is not sufficient after affinity purification, polishing may be followed by ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction, multimodal or gel filtration chromatography.


    Select the chromatography method based on the difference in the properties of the target protein and the impurity protein:

    • Ion Exchange Chromatography: Large difference in isoelectric points

    • Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography: Large differences in hydrophobicity

    • Gel Filtration Chromatography: Large difference in molecular weight

    • Multimodal Chromatography: Ion exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography alone cannot effectively separate

    • Reversed-phase Chromatography: Generally not selected in protein purification, but can be selected in the purification of small molecule polypeptides


    Among them, ion exchange chromatography is convenient to operate and widely used. It is the preferred purification method besides affinity. Especially when the differences in protein properties are not fully known, it can be used as the first choice for testing. Differences in molecular weight can usually be found from SDS PAGE results, and tagged protein fragment impurities are also common in affinity samples.


    Therefore, gel filtration chromatography is also widely used in scientific research. All purification methods except gel filtration chromatography involve changes in pH or conductivity conditions. When selecting a chromatography method, the stability of the target protein should be considered first, and the optional chromatography method and operating range should be determined.


    Method

    Product

    Gel Filtration Chromatography

    ·Chromstar® 4FF/6FF ·Chromstar® CL-4B/CL-6B ·Chromstar® 4B/6B
    ·Geldex® PG ·Puredex® G ·Puredex® LH-20

    Ion Exchange Chromatography

    ·MaXtar® Q/DEAE/S ·MaXtar® Q/SP HR ·Q/SP Chromstar® BB
    ·Q/DEAE/SP/S/CM ·Chromstar® FF·Q/DEAE/SP/CM Chromstar® HP
    ·Q/SP Chromstar® XL ·DEAE Puredex® A50

    Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography

    ·MaXtar® Butyl/Phenyl HS ·MaXtar® Phenyl/Butyl HR
    ·Phenyl Chromstar® 6FF(HS)/(LS)

    ·Octyl/Butyl/Butyl-S Chromstar® 4FF ·Phenyl/Butyl Chromstar® HP

    Mutimodal Chromatography

    ·MaXtar® MMC ·MaXtar® MMC HR

    Table 5: BioLink provides a variety of chromatography resins and pre-packed columns.

    The products marked in bold are suitable for applications in scientific research fields.


    Taking ion exchange as an example, when the target protein has a net positive charge (the solution pH is lower than PI), it can be combined with cation exchange chromatography resin (S, SP, CM); On the contrary, it can be combined with anion exchange chromatography resin (Q, DEAE) to select appropriate pH conditions and corresponding chromatography resin according to the stable pH range of the protein and maximizing the charge difference between the target protein and the impurity protein. Samples need to bind at low conductance and elute at increasing salt concentration or changing pH. In the initial experiment, after protein binding, it can gradually transition from low conductivity solution to high conductivity solution in a linear gradient manner, so as to improve the resolution and find suitable conditions for removing impurities and eluting the target protein.


    Case 2: SP Chromstar® FF Purified Collagen Case

    Sample: Type I Collagen

    Molecular Weight: 300-400 kDa

    Isoelectric Point: 7-9 (theoretical)

    Source: CHO cell expression

    Equilibration: 50 mM HAc-NaAc, pH 4.0, Cond 7.0 mS/cm

    Elution: 50 mM HAc-NaAc+1 M NaCl, pH 4.0

    RT=5 min


    figure-3-type-i-collagen-chromatography.jpg

    Figure 3: Type I collagen chromatography


    Gel filtration chromatography resins separate proteins based on molecular weight differences and are usually not affected by solution conditions. However, there is a weak ion exchange between purely used gel filtration chromatography resins and proteins. Generally, a certain concentration of salt is added to samples and solutions for shielding. In order to achieve better resolution, the loading volume is generally limited to within 5% of the column volume.


    Case 3: Geldex® 200 PG separates proteins with different molecular weights

    Column: 16/600 pre-packed column (Geldex® 200 PG)

    Sample:

    1. Myoglobin, 5.4 mg/mL, Mr 17 000

    2. Ovalbumin, 36 mg/mL, Mr 44 000

    3. HSA, 36 mg/mL, Mr 66 000

    4. IgG, 2.8 mg/mL, Mr 158 000

    5. Equine spleen ferritin, 3.4 mg/mL, Mr 440 000

    Loading Amount: 500 μL

    Flow Rate: 1 mL/min (30 cm/h)

    Buffer: 10 mM PB, 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4 (PBS)


    figure-4-protein-chromatography-performance-of-geldex-200-pg-for-different-molecular-weights.jpg

    Figure 4: Protein chromatography performance of Geldex® 200 PG for different molecular weights


    The starting conditions and ending conditions of different chromatography modes are different. Puredex® G25M can be selected for solution exchange (including desalting) of samples or final products between different chromatography modes. Its protein molecular weight is much larger than that of various salt ions, so compared with gel filtration chromatography resins for polishing, such as Geldex® 200PG, the loading amount can reach 25% of the column volume during desalination.


    Chromatography Mode

    Affinity Chromatography

    Ion Exchange Chromatography

    Multimodal Chromatography

    Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography

    Gel Filtration Chromatography

    Reversed-Phase Chromatography

    Starting Conditions

    Multiple conditions

    Low ionic strength

    Can tolerate a certain ionic strength

    High ionic strength

    Most conditions, limited volume

    Ion-pairing solvents, organic solvents

    Ending Conditions

    Specific conditions

    High ionic strength or changing pH

    pH and ionic strength depend on sample and stationary phase

    Low ionic strength

    Buffer exchange, sample dilution

    Mixed buffer, low ionic strength

    Table 6: Starting and ending conditions for different chromatography modes


    Case 4: Puredex® G-25M Desalination

    Resin: Puredex® G-25M

    Column: Chrom-LinX® 26/400 (H = 34 cm), column volume 170 ml

    Sample: A protein sample (~ 750 kd)

    Sample Volume: 20 ml, 12% column volume

    Flow Rate: 8 mL/min, 90 cm/h

    Buffer: 10 mM acetic acid-sodium acetate, pH 6.0


    figure-5-chromatogram-of-a-protein-sample.jpg

    Figure 5: Chromatogram of a protein sample


    To sum up, affinity chromatography is the first choice for protein purification in scientific research fields, and ion exchange chromatography and gel filtration chromatography also have many applications. There is no fixed paradigm for the purification process, and a variety of chromatography modes need to be selected for combination according to the target protein and impurities. Space is limited and the details of each chromatography cannot be detailed. If necessary, please contact the corresponding sales and technology. BioLink will provide technical and product support at any time.

    References

    Link With Us Now!

    Want to know more about BioLink bioprocessing products? Feel free to contact BioLink now!
    ADDRESS
    We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, analyze site traffic and personalize content. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Visit our cookie policy to learn more.
    Reject Accept